I've been struggling with an anomaly in my code for several days now. I've tried to rewrite the code, change some more variables, add the number iterations but it doesn't work out. But then after re-read the paper again I realize that the problem lies on the number of intervals length, I used a very small number of intervals where actually it need a little more number of intervals length.
How I can miss such information? It's because I thought I've understood the global flow of the algorithm and didn't read small information written at the end of the paragraph. D'oh!Lesson learned: don't assume you've already understood the program, until you read the whole paper thoroughly and in detail.
No comments:
Post a Comment